HP h8-1325l

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP h8-1325l (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141020
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '21 at 11:28
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550-$335 23,599 User benchmarks, average bench 69% , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 204 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 389 52% 389 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1B0A 90B7) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 296.28 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 0.7 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.95% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ts1tssd2 30S 1TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 595GB free Firmware: 02J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 421 392 431 434 440 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 417 Mixed 413 SusWrite 425 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 36.8 4K Mixed 37.9 109% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 111 117% 201 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 111%
Crucial_ CT1050MX30 1TB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 550GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 226 223 223 214 64 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.9% Above average	Read 237 Write 223 Mixed 221 SusWrite 197 50% 220 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 25.3 86% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 185 128% 161 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB 7,786 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 314GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 61 52 50 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 48.6 Write 72.1 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 56 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.5 156% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 1x4GB 1,663 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 9.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 11.4 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h8-1325l Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1325l

CPU
Core i5-3550Intel $335Bench 69%, 23,599 samples	3x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	1x

SSD
30S 1TBTs1tssd2Bench 87%, 37 samples	3x
E240e 240GBDeva'sBench 52%, 50 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 1,663 samples	2x
HX318C10F/8 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 102 samples	1x
Team-Elite-1600 2x8GBTeamBench 54%, 3,520 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $394

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16