Asrock H270 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H270 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 06:41
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$350
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 212
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 477
55% 418 Pts
64-Core 554
37% 554 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$110
Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 16
15% 18.3 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 16.1
18% 20.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 276 283 268 272 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68% Good
Read 341
Write 280
Mixed 248
SusWrite 276
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 18.7
85% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 211
175% 252 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 68%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$80
265GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 188 190 189 188 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 150
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 188
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
40GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 53.8
Mixed 41
SusWrite 53.9
38% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 51%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$47
412GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 86 85 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 67.5
Write 65.5
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 84.9
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 87%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 19 12 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 9.7
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 16.9
24% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.5
123% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX2133C14/8G 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 18.8
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H270 Pro4 - $144

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $884
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback