MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '21 at 20:25
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 223
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 427
57% 427 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 76
Parallax 69.5
60% 72.9 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 69
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 259 256 249 251 243 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 467
Write 339
Mixed 224
SusWrite 254
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 33.8
128% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 186
149% 209 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 92%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
196GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 450 344 289 295 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 433
Mixed 451
SusWrite 332
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 54.8
178% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 366
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 112%
Great: 128%
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 377 320 280 318 371 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 329
Mixed 283
SusWrite 317
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 40.6
142% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 170
170% 274 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC91
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 50.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 49.9
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
575GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 162 160 156 161 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 140
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 157
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 5,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $405
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback