Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210319
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '21 at 23:20
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 84.8 1-Core 120 2-Core 236 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 698 71% 574 Pts	64-Core 925 57% 925 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.2% Very good	Lighting 87.6 Reflection 104 Parallax 104 71% 98.6 fps	MRender 92.9 Gravity 93.3 Splatting 94.4 77% 93.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 301 301 299 294 299 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 300 Mixed 314 SusWrite 300 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 90.6 4K Mixed 36.6 143% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 230 203% 306 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 128%
Jamesdonkey JD1024 1TB 560 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 306GB free Firmware: JD2019 SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 379 424 377 450 1168 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,363 Write 138 Mixed 223 SusWrite 527 122% 563 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 21.2 129% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 892 DQ Write 772 DQ Mixed 523 476% 729 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 248%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 974GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 65 66 66 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 100 Write 90.3 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 64.5 63% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
PNY 8GBF1X08RHJJ40-135-K 2x8GB 825 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 46.3 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 36.7 112% 39.3 GB/s	SC Read 26.7 SC Write 39 SC Mixed 30.3 91% 32 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 113%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	186x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	151x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	144x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	152x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	116x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	106x

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $688

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16