HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8265
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201020
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 22 '21 at 21:03
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD PRO A8-9600 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 44.4
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 126
46% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 247
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 258
17% 258 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 57%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 250GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4T3DB Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 865 511 693 616 257 262 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 2,091
Write 993
Mixed 122
SusWrite 534
204% 935 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 51.1
163% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 326
238% 311 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 181%
Great: 243%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $46
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback