Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '17 at 09:11
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 83.2 1-Core 123 2-Core 225 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 687 68% 557 Pts	64-Core 688 42% 688 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 116 Parallax 96.9 92% 109 fps	MRender 92.7 Gravity 98.1 Splatting 99.5 80% 96.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 90 90 39270141 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 -85693187454231 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 976 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 38 (B1) Unknown 0 0 18 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 39270141 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 39270141 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 39270141 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 88 88 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 60870 (EA) Unknown 0 0 75243 (F1) Unknown 0 0 75243 (F2) Unknown 0 0 63369	66.1% Good	Read 500 Write 137 Mixed 191 60% 276 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 11.9 108% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 11.9 49% 110 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 82%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 109GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 158 5000 (04) Start/Stop count 62 62 38697 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 17 17 61157 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1609 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 720 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 1070207 (C2) HDA temperature 124 72 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	27.3% Poor	Read 46.8 Write 48.1 Mixed 46.5 36% 47.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.33 78% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 44%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 87GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 165 162 4741 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8206 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 20 20 58934 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1100 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 340 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 1449730 (C2) HDA temperature 121 72 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	22.9% Poor	Read 44.1 Write 35.3 Mixed 51 33% 43.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.23 76% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 44%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 39GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 11 (03) Spinup time 172 171 4383 (04) Start/Stop count 84 84 16655 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 3 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 31 31 50565 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1424 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 321 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 16333 (C2) HDA temperature 120 95 27 (C4) Reallocation count 198 198 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 9 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 193 70 1472	66.2% Good	Read 144 Write 86.6 Mixed 122 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.29 94% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MR[A/B]4U300JJJM16G 2x16GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.5% Good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 22.3 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 20.6 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	115x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	68x
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	34x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	11x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $195

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16