| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C51 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191108 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 22 '21 at 20:06 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | BEL-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69%
Good
|
71% 131 Pts
|
64% 517 Pts
|
52% 834 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.9%
Average
|
43% 51 fps
|
36% 44.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 76 187 30 31 32 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
60% 270 MB/s
|
51% 13.2 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
415GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 135 121 142 147 MB/s
|
87.5%
Excellent
|
89% 123 MB/s
|
145% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
35.3%
Below average
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
35% 12.1 GB/s
|
34% 118 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,847 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 533x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 478x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 384x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 312x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 227x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 222x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $280 |