HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100804
Uptime	6.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '21 at 10:34
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	80%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 B55 662 User benchmarks, average bench 47% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 86.7 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 87.5 48% 72.4 Pts	4-Core 87 8-Core 86.8 12% 86.9 Pts	64-Core 85.6 5% 85.6 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 51%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST380013AS 80GB-$75 2,837 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.5 13 27 21 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8.19% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 22.3 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 16 12% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 8.19% Great: 32%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 162GB free Firmware: 10.02E04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 59 56 56 49 46 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 50.7 Write 60.3 Mixed 43 SusWrite 52.8 38% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 35%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.2 3 3.2 3.1 3.3 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	3.92% Terrible	Read 17 Write 2.8 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 3.1 6% 6.35 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.92% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 37GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 10.5 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 8 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

CPU
Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples	53x
Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples	44x
Phenom II X4 B97AMDBench 55%, 1,103 samples	22x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	150x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	17x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G 49GBUnknownBench 33%, 13 samples	4x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 37GBUnknownBench 28%, 75 samples	3x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 37GBUnknownBench 29%, 75 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16