Asus X550JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus X550JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JK
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140709
Uptime8.6 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 23:23
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 157
69% 112 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 254
35% 255 Pts
64-Core 255
17% 255 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Asus(1043 178D) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8813
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 17.6
17% 18.3 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 15.2
16% 16.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 184 80 94 131 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 444
Mixed 377
SusWrite 141
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 58.3
188% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
56GB free
Firmware: GH2OA450
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 31 32 31 31 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 65.7
Write 29.7
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 30.3
29% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 71%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
334GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 125 125 125 120 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 58
Write 85.2
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 121
127% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Elpida EDJ4208EFBG-GNL-F 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X550JK Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback