Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock B550M Steel Legend (all builds)
Memory	50.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '21 at 20:21
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 78 1-Core 146 2-Core 277 90% 167 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 808 78% 644 Pts	64-Core 1,007 62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% PowerColor(148C 2391) CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.4% Above average	Lighting 69 Reflection 64.9 Parallax 95.7 56% 76.5 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 75.8 Splatting 50.4 51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 866 772 825 924 735 997 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	220% Outstanding	Read 2,428 Write 700 Mixed 1,015 SusWrite 853 275% 1,249 MB/s	4K Read 47.5 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 49.1 170% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 606 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 348 274% 391 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 220% Great: 425%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300 8,179 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 65GB free Firmware: RVM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 472 472 472 470 472 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 478 Mixed 431 SusWrite 471 105% 468 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 90.4 4K Mixed 52.5 173% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 369 278% 373 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 132%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 50 50 50 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 135GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 50 50 50 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GVK 2x31.5GB 1,890 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.3% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 19.8 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 21.3 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 142%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	67x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	67x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	59x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	73x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	61x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	61x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $581

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16