Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics94.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 20:06
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$320
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
101% 177 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 946
96% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,165
78% 1,165 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$1,089
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.8% Outstanding
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 105
Parallax 187
52% 119 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 187
Splatting 127
144% 150 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 148%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
905GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1439 1414 1435 1410 1409 1415 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 1,393
Write 1,344
Mixed 1,289
SusWrite 1,420
307% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 75.6
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 99.6
359% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,664
DQ Write 1,521
DQ Mixed 1,669
1,231% 1,618 MB/s
Poor: 306%
This bench: 324%
Great: 590%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$200
796GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 473 478 475 475 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 443
Mixed 424
SusWrite 476
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 62.8
217% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 349
265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB
813GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 184 188 186 187 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 332
Write 199
Mixed 184
SusWrite 187
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 13.9
72% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 27.2
DQ Mixed 55.4
66% 124 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
4TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 151 161 158 162 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 159
Mixed 110
SusWrite 159
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 98%
Sony Hard Drive 2TB
138GB free, PID 05bf
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 60 61 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 51.7
Write 54
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 60.4
63% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 46%
WD My Passport 1TB
763GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 73.2
Write 74.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 77.1
85% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 26.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 28
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 14,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $1,872
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback