Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 20 '21 at 11:28
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$177
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 117
55% 87 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 338
46% 336 Pts
64-Core 358
24% 358 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 65
51% 66.9 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 59.9
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$135
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 327 206 212 217 208 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 406
Mixed 332
SusWrite 247
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 46.7
165% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 134%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$90
923GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 384 414 425 433 436 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 265
Write 225
Mixed 193
SusWrite 402
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 37.6
127% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 358
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 130%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$72
550GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 135 136 147 150 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 144
Write 143
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 138
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 107%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
2TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 105 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 104
Write 75.1
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 104
112% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Vulcan-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 8,229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $339
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback