To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080219
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '21 at 20:33
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	89%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5460-$190 10,360 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 43 2-Core 85.3 44% 67.3 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 123 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% XFX(1682 9270) 2GB CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1470 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	25% Poor	Lighting 32 Reflection 36.4 Parallax 41.8 26% 36.7 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 30.5 Splatting 24.4 23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB 5,968 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 143 145 156 157 44 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.4% Poor	Read 163 Write 153 Mixed 131 SusWrite 128 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 8.9 36% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 18.8 DQ Write 30.8 DQ Mixed 13.8 14% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 90%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47 10,943 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 252GB free Firmware: GKAOA70M SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 44 42 40 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 43.3 Write 40.3 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 41.6 28% 38.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.6 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	706x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	614x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	101x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16