Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 20:17
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$400
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 242
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 841
82% 659 Pts
64-Core 1237
83% 1237 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,376
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
175% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 202
Parallax 234
171% 216 fps
MRender 267
Gravity 216
Splatting 173
180% 219 fps
Poor: 140%
This bench: 175%
Great: 198%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 1342 1301 1263 1290 1278 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,952
Write 1,452
Mixed 854
SusWrite 1,300
310% 1,389 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 55.3
199% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,076
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 921
709% 968 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 263%
Great: 352%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
194GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 341 262 285 201 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 455
Mixed 331
SusWrite 291
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 44.4
152% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 342
261% 353 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$265
60GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,966
Write 1,797
Mixed 1,316
376% 1,693 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 59.1
222% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,132
DQ Write 956
DQ Mixed 1042
781% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 205% Great: 410%
Mushkin Chronos 90GB
42GB free
Firmware: 522ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 101 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 343
Write 126
Mixed 182
SusWrite 101
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 28.5
118% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 136
115% 171 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 171 155 170 166 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 235
Write 200
Mixed 101
SusWrite 162
128% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 2
360% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 114%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2D3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2D3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.2% Above average
MC Read 16
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 15.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 10.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,546
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback