Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '21 at 07:01
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Memory 94.5 1-Core 147 2-Core 295 98% 179 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 778 83% 661 Pts	64-Core 774 48% 774 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8770) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.89% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 5 4% 5.23 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5.1 4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.89% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 624 325 326 323 323 297 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	213% Outstanding	Read 1,986 Write 1,471 Mixed 923 SusWrite 370 263% 1,187 MB/s	4K Read 61.4 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 68 258% 91.9 MB/s	DQ Read 315 DQ Write 1,118 DQ Mixed 1,011 689% 815 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 213% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 145GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 303 304 304 301 298 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 459 Mixed 405 SusWrite 315 94% 416 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 99.1 4K Mixed 58.1 194% 67.1 MB/s	DQ Read 46.1 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 275 189% 222 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB 10,220 User benchmarks, average bench 331% 785GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1731 1607 1707 1739 1726 1490 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	326% Outstanding	Read 2,309 Write 2,147 Mixed 1,727 SusWrite 1,667 441% 1,963 MB/s	4K Read 59.8 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 84.6 282% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 888 DQ Write 1,096 DQ Mixed 953 730% 979 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 326% Great: 431%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$105 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 98 103 103 102 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 110 Write 111 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 101 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 99%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB 2,475 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 5GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 22 22 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 71.6 Write 21.8 Mixed 33 SusWrite 21.2 42% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 76,101 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	MC Read 35.5 MC Write 37.9 MC Mixed 30.9 99% 34.8 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 43 SC Mixed 31.9 91% 32 GB/s	Latency 58.5 68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	910x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	323x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	182x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	266x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	218x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	201x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	56x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	51x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $664

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16