Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 178% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 163% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	186% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	341% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201021
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '21 at 23:55
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$150 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Memory 91.5 1-Core 143 2-Core 288 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 547 8-Core 866 87% 706 Pts	64-Core 1,072 66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	186% Outstanding	Lighting 270 Reflection 245 Parallax 275 220% 263 fps	MRender 314 Gravity 222 Splatting 166 184% 234 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 186% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1751 1707 1698 1708 1705 1704 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	341% Outstanding	Read 2,502 Write 1,889 Mixed 1,750 SusWrite 1,712 440% 1,963 MB/s	4K Read 61.2 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 86.6 282% 98.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,180 DQ Write 1,014 DQ Mixed 1,079 813% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 341% Great: 435%
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB 9,415 User benchmarks, average bench 250% 1.5TB free Firmware: RKT30Q.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1019 569 254 463 241 536 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 1,496 Write 2618 Mixed 1,541 SusWrite 514 348% 1,542 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 185 4K Mixed 81.8 273% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,178 DQ Write 896 DQ Mixed 440 491% 838 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 368%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB 17,343 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	MC Read 40 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 35.3 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 30.2 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 35.9 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,635x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,258x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,408x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,233x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,071x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,465x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,104x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	864x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	769x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	645x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16