Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350M-HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 111 2-Core 214 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 314 42% 314 Pts	64-Core 314 19% 314 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2299 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Lighting 72.7 Reflection 80 Parallax 72.6 59% 75.1 fps	MRender 77.4 Gravity 74.7 Splatting 73 61% 75 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7256G 256GB 5,014 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 406 419 431 429 435 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 494 Write 417 Mixed 192 SusWrite 400 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 13.9 110% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 19.4 81% 176 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 100%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 141 138 142 142 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Read 145 Write 134 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 140 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-8GB-3000 2x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	107% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 41.9 MC Mixed 34.5 112% 39.1 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 40.3 SC Mixed 28.8 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350M-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	35x
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples	25x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	6x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $292

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16