Gigabyte GA-H97-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-HD3  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141119
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 18 '21 at 17:58
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 562
54% 448 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3555) 2GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.33% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 12
8% 11.4 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 11.2
9% 11.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.33%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA480CV10001 480GB
393GB free
Firmware: STWSH012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 438 433 432 431 435 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 229
Write 106
Mixed 270
SusWrite 395
57% 250 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 35.1
123% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 37.3
76% 152 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 85 53 64 84 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 88
Write 16.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 66.6
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
275GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 90 159 159 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 139
Write 67
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 118
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
486GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 58 41 68 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 147
Write 169
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 56.1
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 113%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
407GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 28.1
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 3.5
27% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 37%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
57GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 28.5
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 24.9
36% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97-HD3 Builds (Compare 1,471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $429
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback