Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101228
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '21 at 23:30
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 94.4 1-Core 80.6 2-Core 149 67% 108 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 366 42% 325 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54% Above average	Lighting 68.7 Reflection 65.2 Parallax 92.2 56% 75.4 fps	MRender 66.2 Gravity 73.7 Splatting 48.6 50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 273GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 221 215 215 207 151 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.1% Below average	Read 106 Write 86.9 Mixed 83.3 SusWrite 205 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 18.5 65% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.9 DQ Write 22.8 DQ Mixed 22.1 17% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 102%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 826GB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 161 162 145 160 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 150 Write 139 Mixed 60 SusWrite 154 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TMT251U6CFR8C-PBHC 9401 SH564128FH8N0QNSCG 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.9% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 12.2 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 58.9 68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical POS-PIQ57BQ Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	49x
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	13x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	6x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	30x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	7x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	3x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	3x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	11x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	9x
FLFE85F-C8KM9 CE8 M391B5773CH0-CH9 1604 FLFE85F-C8KM9 CE8 M391B5773CH0-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 31%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16