Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120831
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 20:34
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 124
55% 90 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 207
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 45.4
Parallax 41.1
34% 42.7 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 41
Splatting 35.9
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 95 91 69 79 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 328
Write 142
Mixed 191
SusWrite 94.8
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 29.1
112% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 117
91% 125 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
62GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 84 72 76 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 80.8
Write 80
Mixed 76
SusWrite 81.2
59% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 67%
Seagate BUP RD 4TB
929GB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 62 64 67 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 48.5
Write 52.8
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 62.8
76% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.4
170% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
3TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 106 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 115
Write 97.5
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 109
127% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.8
293% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-478.A00LF 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75M-DGS Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback