Biostar A10N-9830E

Performance Results

Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A10N-9830E  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 18:48
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 41.8
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 90
37% 61.1 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 194
27% 194 Pts
64-Core 173
12% 173 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1CC0) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver:
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 11.9
6% 8.73 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 7
8% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 8%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$56
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 215 190 198 176 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 392
Write 358
Mixed 290
SusWrite 197
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 33.2
111% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 188
142% 191 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905713-030.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A10N-9830E Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 47%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A10N-9830E

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback