Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181001
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '21 at 16:23
Run Duration	770 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 65.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 228 74% 136 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 908 81% 685 Pts	64-Core 2,329 144% 2,329 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% EVGA(3842 6775) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 135 Parallax 137 104% 133 fps	MRender 92.9 Gravity 129 Splatting 114 92% 112 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2410 Write 1,455 Mixed 1,224 374% 1,696 MB/s	4K Read 52.7 4K Write 67.5 4K Mixed 57 189% 59.1 MB/s	DQ Read 709 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 440 339% 474 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 564GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.7 472 462 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 503 Write 471 Mixed 452 SusWrite 156 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 41.8 136% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 320 239% 320 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 133%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 6TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.9 174 174 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 126 Write 142 Mixed 112 SusWrite 58.2 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.8 324% 3 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 670GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 155 156 158 158 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 125 Write 141 Mixed 86 SusWrite 104 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.7 235% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 1 175 174 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 98.5 Write 130 Mixed 92 SusWrite 58.3 70% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 318% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 1.1 115 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 93 Write 103 Mixed 77 SusWrite 38.4 58% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.6 212% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 582GB free Firmware: D781 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 122 Write 135 Mixed 92 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.7 295% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown IRH2666D464L19S/8G 4x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	145% Outstanding	MC Read 60 MC Write 56.7 MC Mixed 56.3 165% 57.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 23.3 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 154%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	84x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	44x
Ryzen TR 2920XAMDBench 81%, 3,902 samples	38x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	16x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	14x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	5x
F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 128%, 25 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 94%, 8,912 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,053

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16