Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 15:56
Run Duration364 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 155
2-Core 310
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,070
99% 825 Pts
64-Core 1,488
92% 1,488 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 219
Parallax 228
189% 226 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 159
Splatting 142
134% 167 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 156%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2347 2384 2396 1403 499 505 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 2,381
Write 2,382
Mixed 1,977
SusWrite 1,589
468% 2,082 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 86
299% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,460
DQ Write 1,171
DQ Mixed 1,403
1,026% 1,345 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 343%
Great: 390%
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA480CV10001 480GB
319GB free
Firmware: STWSN010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 441 441 441 442 442 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 365
Write 348
Mixed 366
SusWrite 441
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 36.8
136% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 145
120% 171 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 139 139 137 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 97.1
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 136
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 116 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 131
Write 76
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 116
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
178GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 189 188 189 191 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 116
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 187
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 105%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 160 160 161 160 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 154
Write 118
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 158
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$123
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 87 89 91 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 48.6
Write 70.2
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 90
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.5
177% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$99
6TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 173 172 174 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 92.1
Write 134
Mixed 73
SusWrite 174
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
243% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 90%
SABRENT 1TB
742GB free
Firmware: RKT343.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2582 2614 1945 1146 1148 1150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.4
Write 26
Mixed 53.4
61% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 2.7
234% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 34.4
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 37.3
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback