| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190514 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 17 '21 at 06:19 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.6%
Above average
|
73% 139 Pts
|
41% 302 Pts
|
20% 332 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42%
Average
|
44% 52.7 fps
|
38% 45.9 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
32.7%
Below average
|
33% 11.5 GB/s
|
27% 9.47 GB/s
|
30% 133 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,792 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,296x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,135x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 135x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 564x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 308x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 266x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $285 |