Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 20:11
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 267
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 833
84% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.3% Good
Lighting 73.8
Reflection 97.4
Parallax 84.7
60% 85.3 fps
MRender 86.3
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 85.8
72% 88.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 293 294 295 295 297 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 487
Mixed 392
SusWrite 310
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 59.2
201% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
424GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 459 469 465 477 478 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 487
Mixed 420
SusWrite 467
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 61.4
206% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 139 137 138 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 150
Write 144
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 137
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$408
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 41
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 23.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback