Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8850H 20,669 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 40.7 2-Core 172 56% 98 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 414 31% 280 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 86%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 216% 356GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA73H2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1382 704 580 582 579 575 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 1,786 Write 1,655 Mixed 1191 SusWrite 734 300% 1,341 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 72.3 226% 77.1 MB/s	DQ Read 857 DQ Write 498 DQ Mixed 654 493% 670 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 281%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD M471A2K43CB1-CTD Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	65.1% Good	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 24.9 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 25.5 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	259x
Quadro P3200NvidiaBench 55%, 1,890 samples	128x
Quadro P5200NvidiaBench 80%, 527 samples	119x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	120x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	81x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 216%, 1,262 samples	48x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	79x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	40x
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 82%, 1,927 samples	28x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16