Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L875-11H (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120424
Uptime	841.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '21 at 15:35
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	ISL-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 79.4 2-Core 162 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 430 40% 336 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB41) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.8 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT07B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 221 236 236 239 238 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 414 Write 247 Mixed 163 SusWrite 232 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 19.5 74% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 55.2 98% 197 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB 1,257 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.1 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.1 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16