Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 84% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PH315-52 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Covini_CFS
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190902
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '21 at 15:35
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	17%
CPU Throttled	84%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 90.5 1-Core 133 2-Core 248 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 673 71% 570 Pts	64-Core 779 48% 779 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 256GB 1,060 User benchmarks, average bench 169% 35GB free Firmware: 10121000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 914 Write 1,196 Mixed 874 223% 995 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 54.7 182% 65.6 MB/s	DQ Read 856 DQ Write 730 DQ Mixed 798 597% 795 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 213%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 339GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1314 1239 1247 1252 1244 1176 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 1,107 Write 1,298 Mixed 835 SusWrite 1,245 253% 1,121 MB/s	4K Read 53.4 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 69.7 230% 78.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,098 DQ Write 779 DQ Mixed 919 692% 932 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 372%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB 18,166 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 293GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 75 77 75 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 68.7 Write 63.2 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 74.2 46% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.7 177% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SF4642G8CK8IEHLSBG 04CB 32GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2667, 2667 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 26.4 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 36.6 SC Mixed 27.8 78% 27.5 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 3,901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	3,345x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	554x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,796x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	1,498x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	604x

SSD
KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GBNvmeBench 103%, 4,910 samples	358x
WDC PC SN720 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 159%, 3,211 samples	338x
WDC PC SN720 SDA 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 3,501 samples	302x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 17,072 samples	1,239x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	791x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	208x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16