Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2 (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '21 at 14:54
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 72 2-Core 135 60% 97.1 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 384 37% 302 Pts	64-Core 421 26% 421 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% HP(103C 82FC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.3 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.9% Below average	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 56.9 Parallax 58.3 30% 50.9 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 43.5 Splatting 44.4 41% 50.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 65 67 19 27 18 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.3% Very poor	Read 169 Write 92.5 Mixed 93 SusWrite 39.3 22% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 2.4 22% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 56%
P4-960 960GB 329 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 522GB free Firmware: SN3421 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 43 42 43 42 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.5% Below average	Read 184 Write 165 Mixed 168 SusWrite 43 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 18.2 63% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 24.1 DQ Write 24 DQ Mixed 17.8 15% 22 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 231GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 46 44 45 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 148 Write 146 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 45.7 65% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 107%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 88GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 42 42 42 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 52 Write 52.3 Mixed 41.8 SusWrite 42.5 35% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 35%
Maxtor 6V250F0 251GB 1,385 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 98GB free Firmware: VA111630 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 44 45 45 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 55 Write 68.8 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 45.4 39% 52.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.3 150% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 39%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 127GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 69 70 46 43 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 93.3 Write 86.3 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 49.7 53% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 62%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 1TB 621 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 48GB free, PID 0b09 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 25 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 25.8 Write 24.5 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 24.3 33% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.8% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 15.8 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 11 28% 9.63 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 R2 Builds (Compare 914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2

CPU
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	371x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	273x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	132x
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	56x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	43x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	16x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	281x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	117x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $144

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16