| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090223 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 16 '21 at 14:41 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.9%
Average
|
48% 74.9 Pts
|
14% 100 Pts
|
6% 99.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.2
|
28.5%
Poor
|
30% 41.8 fps
|
26% 32.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 181 151 150 152 151 MB/s
|
74.2%
Very good
|
50% 224 MB/s
|
144% 48.7 MB/s
|
149% 199 MB/s
|
|
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
16GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 22 23 24 25 24 MB/s
|
31.2%
Below average
|
59% 56.6 MB/s
|
134% 2.77 MB/s
| |
|
|
38.9%
Below average
|
49% 36.6 MB/s
|
556% 7.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
|
22.7%
Poor
|
20% 7.03 GB/s
|
20% 7.03 GB/s
|
46% 86 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 363 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 79x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 32x |
| Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 26x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |