Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '21 at 14:26
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 74.6 1-Core 144 2-Core 268 88% 162 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 762 78% 632 Pts	64-Core 934 58% 934 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4013) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	63.6% Good	Lighting 78.9 Reflection 74.7 Parallax 74.7 64% 76.1 fps	MRender 95.8 Gravity 71.7 Splatting 66.3 62% 77.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 3 17 6.4 18 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 394 Write 252 Mixed 258 SusWrite 70 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 14.6 64% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 33.9 DQ Mixed 42.9 38% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 55%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 121GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 244 82 75 83 82 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 422 Mixed 366 SusWrite 156 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 97.7 4K Mixed 42.9 151% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 365 275% 367 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.1% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 25.2 64% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 25.8 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 91.2 44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,385x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	805x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	470x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	422x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	294x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	293x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	151x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	387x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	240x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	206x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $477

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16