Asrock H77M

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H77M (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '21 at 14:20
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 71.3 1-Core 91.5 2-Core 164 63% 109 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 308 38% 291 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0152) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 96 285 342 351 360 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 399 Write 322 Mixed 261 SusWrite 264 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 26 92% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 253 216% 318 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 916GB free Firmware: CC4B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 170 Write 127 Mixed 79.4 93% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 10.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.6 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 98.4 41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77M Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	54x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	43x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	42x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	31x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $570

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16