Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-D  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 13:20
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6098P
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 296
40% 296 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.4
30% 38.8 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 39
Splatting 27.7
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 262 219 206 206 205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 407
Mixed 354
SusWrite 235
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 43.9
152% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 172 171 168 181 173 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 88%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.3 2.5 4.2 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 91.6
Write 124
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 12.3
56% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
171% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 69%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
2TB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 130 130 130 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 117
Write 96.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 129
135% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.1
182% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58%
Great: 52%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 38 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 36.4
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 37.2
48% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1
168% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 87 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 76.1
Write 76.7
Mixed 44
SusWrite 88.1
97% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Kingston KHX2133C14/16G 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 24.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 24.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $197
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback