MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59)

Performance Results


Gaming 148% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 226% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	169% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C59
Motherboard	MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) (all builds)
Memory	55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200513
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '21 at 06:32
Run Duration	332 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 3960X-$1,350 6,609 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Memory 64.4 1-Core 153 2-Core 305 91% 174 Pts	4-Core 591 8-Core 1,109 101% 850 Pts	64-Core 4,231 262% 4,231 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% EVGA(3842 3975) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	169% Outstanding	Lighting 236 Reflection 221 Parallax 335 192% 264 fps	MRender 320 Gravity 164 Splatting 178 175% 221 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 568 284 289 283 270 263 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	156% Outstanding	Read 1,949 Write 1,067 Mixed 651 SusWrite 326 220% 998 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 51.7 176% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 42.6 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 52.3 48% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 254%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 521GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 385 406 394 330 386 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 442 Mixed 429 SusWrite 383 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 53.7 175% 59 MB/s	DQ Read 43 DQ Write 94 DQ Mixed 59.1 48% 65.4 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 1TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 384 406 394 330 386 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 443 Write 442 Mixed 433 SusWrite 384 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 85.7 4K Mixed 56.2 183% 61.8 MB/s	DQ Read 46.6 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 59.6 50% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 127%
G-drive USB 6TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2602 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 213 216 228 230 223 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 237 Write 238 Mixed 131 SusWrite 222 47% 207 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 1.3 12% 4.43 MB/s	DQ Read 3.8 DQ Write 5.1 DQ Mixed 5 4% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 27%
Toshiba MG05ACA800E 8TB 461 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 1TB free Firmware: GX0R SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 145 145 142 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 177 Mixed 93.2 SusWrite 143 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 197% 2 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 133%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 580GB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 153 150 160 151 159 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 143 Write 142 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 155 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.6 228% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 113%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 15GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 4.3 3 2.8 3.2 3.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	3.88% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 5.5 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 3.1 7% 7.18 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.88% Great: 15%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 15GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.8 3 3.4 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	4.02% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 9.7 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 3.5 10% 8.82 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.02% Great: 15%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 15GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.8 4.2 3.3 2.8 2.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	3.81% Terrible	Read 16.9 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.1 7% 7 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.81% Great: 15%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 14GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.4 3 3 3.3 3.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 15.4 Write 3 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 2.8 7% 6.72 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 8x8GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	133% Outstanding	MC Read 53.2 MC Write 52.1 MC Mixed 55.3 153% 53.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 30.1 62% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 188%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 279%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59)

CPU
Ryzen TR 3960XAMD $1,350Bench 87%, 6,609 samples	45x
Ryzen TR 3970XAMD $1,900Bench 86%, 5,130 samples	44x
Ryzen TR 3990XAMDBench 86%, 1,222 samples	6x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	32x
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,800Bench 370%, 25,956 samples	11x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	10x

SSD
Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSabrent $160Bench 359%, 8,291 samples	8x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	7x

RAM
F4-3200C16-32GTZN 4x31.8GBG.SKILLBench 113%, 791 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GBCorsairBench 86%, 10,968 samples	4x
F4-3200C16-32GVK 4x31.8GBG.SKILLBench 113%, 1,068 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $2,816

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16