Asus M4N75TD

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4N75TD (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100820
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '21 at 04:18
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 970 2,539 User benchmarks, average bench 56% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 78.1 1-Core 50.9 2-Core 103 49% 77.3 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 206 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Lighting 24.4 Reflection 27.4 Parallax 33.9 20% 28.6 fps	MRender 33.9 Gravity 31.3 Splatting 27.4 25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 84 82 73 92 92 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.1% Good	Read 214 Write 190 Mixed 170 SusWrite 80.7 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 44.6 141% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 44.5 DQ Write 98.2 DQ Mixed 61.2 50% 68 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 129%
Hitachi HDT725040VLA360 400GB 1,414 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 326GB free Firmware: V5COA58A SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 65 64 64 64 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 62.9 Write 52.7 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 63.7 40% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 37%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 466GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 92 93 93 93 94 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 100 Write 100 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 89.2 65% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.7% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 12.3 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 84.2 48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4N75TD Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N75TD

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	6x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	6x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	5x

GPU
HD 5830AMDBench 13%, 2,946 samples	3x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	2x

SSD
Z400s 256GBSanDisk $221Bench 72%, 10,770 samples	3x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	6x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	6x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 30% - Below average

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16