Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H V2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '21 at 03:49
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 177 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 246 34% 251 Pts	64-Core 305 19% 305 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU) 44,235 User benchmarks, average bench 15% AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 20.6 Reflection 16.4 Parallax 29.3 17% 22.1 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 23.5 Splatting 14.2 14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 55 149 91 70 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	75% Very good	Read 489 Write 433 Mixed 420 SusWrite 121 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 27.4 130% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 1.3 57% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 246GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 108 108 108 108 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 117 Write 114 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 107 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB 87,891 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 45.1 MC Write 45.4 MC Mixed 38.2 123% 42.9 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 45.2 SC Mixed 30 94% 32.8 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	213x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	190x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	159x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	112x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	98x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	85x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	79x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	31x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	32x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16