Acer Aspire TC-865

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-865  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-865
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 02:54
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$161
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 597
69% 538 Pts
64-Core 641
40% 641 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 75
Reflection 74.1
Parallax 75.4
61% 74.8 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 71
Splatting 0.1
31% 43.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
464GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 48 27 40 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 34
Write 41.5
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 40.2
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
50% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
57GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 19.5
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 18.1
32% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.9
190% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 39%
General 2GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.9 4.7 4.9 4.9 4.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 4.7
8% 6.77 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-865 Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-865

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $211
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback