| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 9.39% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C89 |
| Motherboard | MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20201015 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 16 '21 at 00:30 |
| Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
| Run User | DZA-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
83.6%
Excellent
|
85% 151 Pts
|
70% 572 Pts
|
39% 628 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.2%
Average
|
47% 56.6 fps
|
45% 56.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU630 240GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 38 24 20 34 MB/s
|
9.39%
Terrible
|
24% 104 MB/s
|
10% 3.67 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
194GB free
Firmware: JPFOA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 62 61 61 61 MB/s
|
35%
Below average
|
38% 51.7 MB/s
|
132% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.5%
Below average
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
26% 9.23 GB/s
|
56% 71 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 3,289 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 1,164x |
| Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 775x |
| Core i5-10400Intel $125Bench 84%, 71,804 samples | 331x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 309x |
| RTX 3060Nvidia $275Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 235x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 229x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $282 |