Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER CASPER NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160809
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '21 at 22:20
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	39%
CPU Throttled	93%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U 139,101 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 71.3 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 162 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 256 32% 243 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1B0A 22CD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.27% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 7.6 5% 10.2 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 11.4 6% 6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.27% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 44 43 45 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 381 Write 75.5 Mixed 95.9 SusWrite 43.6 32% 149 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 20.2 4K Mixed 12.2 42% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 24.2 DQ Mixed 33.7 41% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 842GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 109 110 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 104 Write 106 Mixed 34 SusWrite 108 64% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB 9,135 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.8 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 17.9 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	274x
Core i5-4210MIntelBench 51%, 15,981 samples	218x
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	214x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	596x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	320x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	188x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	102x
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	84x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x

RAM
CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 51%, 9,135 samples	130x
M2S8G64CB8HB5N-DI 1x8GBNanyaBench 30%, 565 samples	80x
CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GBCrucialBench 26%, 4,731 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16