Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512FL
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200804
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '21 at 20:19
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	100%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	45.5% Average	Memory 67.9 1-Core 33.7 2-Core 73 39% 58.2 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 195 20% 161 Pts	64-Core 341 21% 341 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1FBE) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 4.8 5% 4.4 fps	MRender 8.3 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 0.2 4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB 3,002 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 172 262 175 176 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1,218 Write 921 Mixed 1,092 SusWrite 195 191% 857 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 63 221% 81.2 MB/s	DQ Read 761 DQ Write 586 DQ Mixed 652 493% 666 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 179%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 802GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 138 139 140 138 140 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 141 Write 138 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 137 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 219% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 1x8GB 1,088 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	31% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 10.6 32% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	122x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	43x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	110x
GeForce MX250NvidiaBench 14%, 8,806 samples	55x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	58x
KINGSTON RBUSNS8 512GBNvmeBench 125%, 1,404 samples	15x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	11x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	61x
M471A1K44BM0-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,088 samples	25x
M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 4,290 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16