Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S6 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2799
Memory	14.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20180711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '21 at 18:22
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 81.3 1-Core 41.7 2-Core 106 48% 76.3 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 442 34% 304 Pts	64-Core 596 37% 596 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 84%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 217 220 215 218 217 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.4% Good	Read 212 Write 230 Mixed 196 SusWrite 218 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 38.2 112% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 45.6 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 63.2 55% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 12 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 13.5 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56721stBench 71%, 426 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	1x
X150 240GBEmtecBench 66%, 3,577 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $272

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16