Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190823
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '21 at 16:03
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$95 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 73.6 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 166 60% 104 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 458 48% 388 Pts	64-Core 490 30% 490 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics 47,368 User benchmarks, average bench 16% AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Lighting 21.2 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 30.6 17% 22.5 fps	MRender 8.6 Gravity 26 Splatting 15.8 14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 18%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85C6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.2% Poor	Lighting 34 Reflection 36 Parallax 34.9 28% 35 fps	MRender 35 Gravity 37 Splatting 26.1 26% 32.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD NTC 480GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 356 171 85 38 1.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 424 Write 381 Mixed 20 SusWrite 119 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 0.9 40% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 8.9 DQ Mixed 35.9 35% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 583GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 162 155 159 162 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 169 Mixed 97 SusWrite 160 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB 28,435 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.7% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 25.9 70% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 18.8 54% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 93.3 43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	258x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	193x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	144x

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $393

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16