Fujitsu ESPRIMO E400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E400  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2990-A2
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 15:50
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 157
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 277
34% 263 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 86.9
53% 71.7 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 47.2
49% 61.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 72 1.9 2.3 4.6 2.7 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22% Poor
Read 177
Write 138
Mixed 102
SusWrite 36.8
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 9.8
38% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 24.8
DQ Mixed 15.9
14% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 22%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
635GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 34 32 34 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 41.3
Write 41.8
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 30.5
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 859B CT102464BA1339.M16 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E400 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback