Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3430 4,096 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 63.9 2-Core 128 57% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 237 8-Core 255 32% 246 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 34AE) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	7.1% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 12.1 Parallax 3.5 8% 8.43 fps	MRender 8.6 Gravity 8 Splatting 4.6 6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.1% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$31 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,361 Write 3,156 Mixed 3,183 722% 3,233 MB/s	4K Read 206 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 133 547% 154 MB/s	DQ Read 739 DQ Write 604 DQ Mixed 674 504% 673 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1332, 1332, 1332, 1332 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11.7 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	10x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	7x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16