Asrock Z97X Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z97X Killer (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '21 at 09:54
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 98 1-Core 130 2-Core 266 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 486 59% 452 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1140 MHz, MLim: 1442 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 71 Reflection 77.6 Parallax 95.5 58% 81.4 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 65.8 Splatting 49.9 49% 61.9 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 195 192 196 191 197 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Read 455 Write 444 Mixed 355 SusWrite 217 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 46 153% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 358 268% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 94GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,129 Write 5,872 Mixed 5,735 1,252% 5,579 MB/s	4K Read 584 4K Write 268 4K Mixed 398 1,538% 417 MB/s	DQ Read 1,994 DQ Write 1,499 DQ Mixed 1731 1,298% 1,741 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 102 105 105 106 106 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 123 Write 110 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 102 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 83%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 138 146 146 141 145 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 96 Write 108 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 143 67% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.7 204% 2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 87%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 132 141 145 145 146 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 102 Write 113 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 141 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.6 232% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 92%
Seagate Desktop 8TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 4.5TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 79 83 88 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 105 Write 119 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 80.9 70% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.6 216% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 93%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB 1,735 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 148 148 148 148 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 157 Write 164 Mixed 115 SusWrite 147 197% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB 7,519 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	MC Read 32 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 25.4 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.3 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 26.7 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 46.2 87% 46.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z97X Killer Builds (Compare 687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97X Killer - $195

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	352x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	111x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	96x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	50x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	27x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	26x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x

RAM
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	33x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	27x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $873

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16