Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 83.5 2-Core 172 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 328 44% 327 Pts	64-Core 317 20% 317 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% PNY(196E 1381) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 16.5 15% 17.1 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 18.4 Splatting 15.1 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 69 71 75 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 96.4 Write 97.7 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 68.6 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 04CB EL64C1C1624Z1 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 04CB EL64C1C1624Z1 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.8% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	449x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	394x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	79x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16