Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201203
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '21 at 02:37
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$202 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 74.4 1-Core 166 2-Core 322 99% 187 Pts	4-Core 609 8-Core 1,008 99% 808 Pts	64-Core 1,511 94% 1,511 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$394 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 2183) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	109% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 141 Parallax 143 114% 142 fps	MRender 145 Gravity 133 Splatting 113 105% 130 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,469 Write 2,346 Mixed 1,668 481% 2,161 MB/s	4K Read 66.5 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 92.2 306% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,311 DQ Write 1,168 DQ Mixed 1,223 921% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 35GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 362 327 235 209 189 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 373 Write 357 Mixed 353 SusWrite 280 77% 341 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 52.4 177% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 218 162% 216 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 380GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 492 493 493 491 491 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	138% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 481 Mixed 443 SusWrite 491 109% 482 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 67.6 227% 80.6 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 372 280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 168GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 93 95 95 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 116 Write 108 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 94.3 74% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 46,140 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 33.6 88% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.1 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 35.5 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 91.6 44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	217x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)