PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Lenovo 90BG0020CF (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO Bantry CRB |
Memory | 2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141217 |
Uptime | 2.3 Days |
Run Date | Apr 14 '21 at 23:58 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 69% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
661GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 56 49 41 65 59 MB/s
|
35.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 9x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |