Packard EasyNote TE69CX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPackard EasyNote TE69CX  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EA50_CX
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 22:22
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2117U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 99.7
49% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 99.2
8-Core 98.4
13% 98.8 Pts
64-Core 99.6
6% 99.6 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0835) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 1.4
1% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 196 1.7 1.9 1.2 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 291
Write 1.5
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 55.8
19% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
3% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DBST4GN568S 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TE69CX Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TE69CX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback