MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	MSI MS-7522
Motherboard	MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522) (all builds)
Memory	21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '21 at 19:52
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 97.2 1-Core 106 2-Core 211 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 644 62% 512 Pts	64-Core 789 49% 789 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 46.2 Reflection 42.6 Parallax 40.7 38% 43.2 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 44.1 Splatting 28.7 30% 37 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 250G 250GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 120 121 122 122 MB/s Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	83.1% Excellent	Read 266 Write 255 Mixed 252 SusWrite 121 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 55 180% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 199 150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 128%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB 4,401 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2.5TB free Firmware: KQ00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 100 101 100 101 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 169 Write 172 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 101 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 0.6 7% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 20%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 289GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 142 142 144 144 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	82.2% Excellent	Read 266 Write 255 Mixed 240 SusWrite 142 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 52 173% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 198 149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 134%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 23GB free Firmware: M6CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 141 138 139 140 141 MB/s Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.4% Good	Read 266 Write 243 Mixed 236 SusWrite 139 50% 221 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 83.2 4K Mixed 20.9 122% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 27.6 61% 124 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 148GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 75 76 75 76 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 83.9 Write 88.9 Mixed 48 SusWrite 74.9 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 62%
Terra USThree 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 0GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 14 21 15 21 21 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 7 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 16.6 20% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 65% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 20 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 15.5 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 49.6 81% 49.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Pro-E (MS-7522) Builds (Compare 857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	188x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	124x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	87x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	65x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	63x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	56x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	116x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	74x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $244

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16